← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61053/2024bail granted

Md. Jyauddin Ansari @ Ziauddin Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-01Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61053 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-645 Year-2023 Thana- GAYA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGaya ====================================================== Md. Jyauddin Ansari @ Ziauddin Ansari Son of Md. Emamuddin Ansari R/o Village- Madarpur, Diwan Bigha, P.S.- Roshanganj (Banke Bazar), DistrictGaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Jinat Pravin D/o Shamsher Alam, W/o Jyauddin Ansari R/o Diwan Bigha, P.O. and P.S.- Roushanganj, District- Gaya, at present Village- Parsawan Tola Karamdih, P.O. Parsawan Khurd, P.S.- Roushanganj, District- Gaya ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Javed Jafar Khan, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Meena Singh, APP For the Informant Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha, Adv ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the state.

2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case no. 645 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case is based upon a complaint wherein the allegation of demand of dowry and torture, has been made.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation made in the complaint are not correct. It is also

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61053 of 2024(6) dt.01-05-2025 2/3 submitted that the petitioner is employee in railway and working at Mumbai and has an old father and mother to be taken care of. The petitioner also suffers from a disability which is Locomotor Disability and the certificate of the Civil Surgeon in respect to the same has also been annexed as Annexure-2 to the petition.

5. The APP for the state oppose the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. At this stage, the learned counsel for the petitioner makes an offer to pay a sum of Rs. 4000/- per month to the complaint subject to final outcome of any maintenance or collateral proceeding.

7. Considering all the above mentioned facts and circumstances, I am inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. accordingly, in the event of his arrest/ surrender within a period of four weeks from today the petitioner shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of rs 10,000/- (ten thousand)with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Sherghati in Complaint Case no. 645 of 2023, subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C and subject to the further condition that the petitioner shall cooperate in investigation/ trial.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61053 of 2024(6) dt.01-05-2025 3/3 8 . Learned counsel for the O.P.No. 2 under instruction, submits that she undertakes to provide her bank account details to the petitioner within a period of two weeks from today, if the O.P.No. 2 furnishes the bank account in which the amount can be transferred, and yet the petitioner fails to give the aforesaid amount on two consecutive dates to O.P.No.2, the O.P.No.2 would be at liberty to file cancellation of bail . (Soni Shrivastava, J) N.K/- U T