Patna High CourtCR. MISC./16987/2016bail granted

Rajeev Kumar Rai @ Rajeev Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-04-25Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16987 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -247 Year- 2015 Thana -PUPRI District- SITAMARHI ======================================================

1. Rajeev Kumar Rai @ Rajeev Kumar Son of Ram Sharan Rai, R/o Village- Harsaha, P.s.- Pupri, District- Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. M. Dayal(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 25-04-2016 Heard Mr. Jha for the petitioner and Mr. M. Dayal, APP for the State.

Petitioner is accused of Pupri P.S. Case No. 247 of 2015 registered under Sections 363 and 366 of the Indian Penal Code.

In relation to the missing of the 20 years old daughter of the informant, the F.I.R. was lodged on 22.09.2015. Four persons excluding the petitioner are named therein. On retrieval, the girl was produced for her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C.. In her such statement (Annexure-2), she has stated that on her own volition, she got married with the petitioner. Mr. Jha states that the girl is living in the house of the petitioner as his wife as the Magistrate released her in favour of the mother of the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16987 of 2016 (2) dt.25-04-2016 2/2 Considering the above, in the event of arrest or surrender in the Court below within four weeks, the petitioner abovenamed is directed to be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sitamarhi in Pupri P.S. Case No. 247 of 2015 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with a further following condition that one of the bailers shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner. (Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Pankaj/- U T