Kamal Kishore Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.24901 of 2013 ======================================================
1. Kamal Kishore Yadav S/O Vimal Yadav, Resident Of VillageBikhanpur, P.S- Bounsi, P.O- Gorgama, District- Banka. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The State Project Directorate, Bihar Shiksha Pariyojana Parishad, Patna.
3. The District Programme Officer, (Primary Education) Sarv Siksha Abhiyan, Banka.
4. The District Magistrate, Banka.
5. The District Education Officer, Banka.
6. Suresh Mandal S/O Not Known R/O Ramashi, P.S- Sanhaula, DisttBhagalpur. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjiva Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Shiw Kumar Prabhakar, Advocate For the State : Mr. A. Ujjwal, SC-25 For Bihar Education Project: Mr. Girijesh Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-08-2017 In the present writ application, the petitioner has sought for quashing of Memo No. Comp-1 dated 6.6.2013 issued by the District Education Officer-cum-District Programme Officer, Banka, by which the engagement of the petitioner on contractual basis as Night Guard has been terminated. The petitioner was engaged as Night Guard in Kasturba Gandhi Residential School, Sahu Pokhar, Banka. The said School is being run under the scheme 'Sarv Shiksha Abhiyan'. Engagement of teaching and non-teaching staffs is made on contractual basis. No statutory right has accrued in favour
Patna High Court CWJC No.24901 of 2013 (3) dt.30-08-2017 2/2 of the petitioner. These are basically administrative matters, which must be left in the hands of the authorities because they know the best how to run the affairs of the School in question under a scheme.
In view of the aforesaid, the present writ application stands dismissed.
The dismissal of the writ application will not come in the way of the petitioner, if he would like to move the Civil Court of competent jurisdiction for redressal of his grievances. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U