Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44899/2018bail granted

Chinta Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-27Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44899 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-309 Year-2013 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya ====================================================== Chinta Devi W/o Rajendra Yadav, R/o Vill.- Yehyapur, Dangra, P.S.- Fatehpur, Distt.- Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. S. Jamil Akhtar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Smt. Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 309 of 2013 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of committing murder of the sister of the Informant along with her family members.

Petitioner is Mother-in-Law of deceased. The allegations are general and omnibus in nature. Father-in-law of the deceased has been granted bail vide order dated 15.03.2018 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 14956 of 2018. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 23.05.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44899 of 2018(4) dt.27-09-2018 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-Sherghati, Gaya, in connection with Barachatti (Mohanpur) P.S. Case No. 309 of 2013, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and her absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel her bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U