Khonai Rishidev @ Khonay Rishidev v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53278 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-434 Year-2016 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

KHONAI RISHIDEV @ KHONAY RISHIDEV, age 56 yrs, Male, Son of Late Yugal Rishidev 2.

Nityanand Rishidev, age 47 yrs. Male, Son of Baldev Rishidev, Both are Resident of village - Pulaha, Barhepara, P.S.- Narpatganj, Distt - Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Md. Naushad Uzzoha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umesh Lal Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Earlier, the bail application of the petitioners was rejected vide Annexure-1, giving liberty to renew their prayer after one year in jail custody.

It has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 21.07.2018, i.e, more than one year.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53278 of 2019(2) dt.28-08-2019 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Narpatganj P.S. Case No. 434/2016 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T