Mukesh @ Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68125 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-684 Year-2020 Thana- BANKA District- Banka ====================================================== Mukesh @ Mukesh Yadav @ Mukesh Kumar Yadav Son of Tetu Yadav Resident of Village Hathiya Pathar, Police Station Fullidumar, District Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Mukherjee For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 15-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

By order dated 11.08.2021, prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected vide Cr. Misc. No.4713 of 2021 with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now charge has been framed.

Having considered the fact that charge has been framed, let petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Banka in connection with S.T. No.223 of 2021, arising out of Banka P.S. Case No.684 of 2020, subject to the following conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68125 of 2021(2) dt.15-12-2021 2/2

(1) that one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. He will also undertake to inform the court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

(2) That the petitioner will be well represented on each and every date fixed in the case and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.

(3) That the petitioner will mark his attendance in the local police station in the first week of every month till conclusion of trial, failing which the prosecution will be at liberty to move cancellation of his bail bond.

(4) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that they will inform the court concerned, if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U T