Brindavan Bihari Lal Verma v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3272 of 2015 ====================================================== Brindavan Bihari Lal Verma son of Late Kishun Prasad, Resident of Bhatta Bazar, P.S. Khazanchi Hat, District Purnia.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Presiding Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal, 34 - Bank Road, Opposite New Police Line, Lodipur, Patna.

2. The Presiding Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal, 34- Bank Road, Opposite New Police Line, Lodipur, Patna.

3. M/s Purnia Talkies Company, a Partnership Firm, through its Partner Dharma Narain Saha son of Late Suraj Lal Saha, resident of High School Para, Katihar, P.S. and District Katihar.

4. The State Bank of India, Gulabbag Branch, Gulab Bagh, Purnia. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kejriwal, Advocate For the Bank : Mr. Kaushlendra Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the Union of India : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, ASG For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Satish Narayan Sinha, Mr. Sanjeev Ranjan, Advocates ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 24-09-2015 After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to raise all points before the appropriate forum.

2. As prayed, the writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn and dismissed as such, with the aforesaid liberty.

3. It is made clear that in case the petitioner seeks remedy by way of appeal as may be available to him, the question of condonation of delay may be sympathetically considered having regard to the fact that the petitioner had been pursuing the present writ petition before this Court.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/- U