Sanjit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.8014 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -112 Year- 2014 Thana -SARAI DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Sanjit Kumar S/o Bhikhan Ram Resident of Village + P.S. Kudhani, DistMuzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Braj Kishore Prasad(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMARESH KUMAR LAL ORAL ORDER 21-04-2015 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the petition. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of IPC. Allegation is that some criminals had assembled to commit an offence (dacoity).

It is submitted that the name of the petitioner has appeared in the statement of co-accused who were apprehended on the spot by the police with incriminating articles. Five persons were apprehended on the spot, out of whom, Abhay Kumar and Sanjay Kumar have been granted bail vide order dated 22.10.2014

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.8014 of 2015 (2) dt.21-04-2015 2/2 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 38569 of 2014 and its analogous case. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and nothing has been recovered from his possession.

Considering the facts and circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District Judge, VI, Vaishali at Hajipur/court concerned in Sarai P. S. Case No. 112 of 2014 with following conditions:-

1. The petitioner will not indulge himself in similar or any other offence.

2. One of the bailors must be the close relative of the petitioner.

3. The petitioner will be well represented in the Court on each and every date and in case of absence for two consecutive dates or in case of violation of terms of bail, his bail bond would be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Amaresh Kumar Lal, J) Kanchan/- U T