Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55700/2025bail rejected

Bhageshwar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-11-03Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55700 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-95 Year-2024 Thana- PURAINI District- Madhepura ====================================================== BHAGESHWAR YADAV Son of Damodar Yadav Resident of village - Balatol, Ward No.- 10, P.S.- Puraini, District - Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nafisu Zzoha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Gulnar Begum, A.P.P.

For the Informant :

Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, informant and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Puraini P. S. Case No. 95 of 2024 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per F.I.R., 21.05.2024 at about 8:45 PM, when husband of the informant was returning home, all the F.I.R. named accused persons including this petitioner assaulted him by means of iron rod, sticks and firearms. It is further alleged that this petitioner inflicted knife blow and other accused person shot him as a result of which he died during course of treatment.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55700 of 2025(3) dt.03-11-2025 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Petitioner claims clean antecedent and is in custody since 28.05.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant vehemently opposed the bail application and submitted that during treatment, deceased supported the prosecution case and has specifically stated that it was this petitioner and other accused persons who assaulted him.

6. Considering the nature of accusation and gravity of the offence, prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

7. However, since petitioner is in custody since 28.05.2024, Trial Court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial, preferably, within a period of one year from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T