Omaish @ Guddu @ Md. Osaid @ Mahhamadan Osaid v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60238 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-506 Year-2024 Thana- DHAKA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.
Omaish @ Guddu @ Md. Osaid @ Mahhamadan Osaid S/o Abdul Khalis @ Abdul Khalik R/o Village- Chainpur Dhaka, P.S- Dhaka, District- East Champaran 2.
Mahajbina Khatoon @ Mahajavi Aara W/o Omaish @ Guddu @ Md. Osaid @ Mahhamadan Osaid R/o Village- Chainpur Dhaka, P.S- Dhaka, DistrictEast Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kush, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Meena Singh, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Zaki Haider, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 506/2024 dated 04.12.2024 registered for the offence punishable u/s 80 and 61(1) read with 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners and the co-accused persons are alleged to have killed the informant's grand-daughter due to non-fulfillment of demand of Rs. 5 lacs and a motorcycle as dowry.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60238 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/3 that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners who are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased. The petitioners neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the deceased. It is submitted that the deceased was not subjected to torture and cruelty soon before her death for or in connection with demand of dowry. The petitioners have clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 15.04.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners by submitting that the informant's grand-daughter died within six months of her marriage at her matrimonial house. As per the post-mortem report, the cause of death is due to asphyxia due to hanging.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above-named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Sikrahana at Dhaka, in connection
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60238 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 3/3 with Dhaka P.S. Case No. 506/2024.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) atul/- U T