Kari Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17986 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -123 Year- 2015 Thana -PIPRA District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Kari Yadav, Son of Late Gugal Yadav,

2. Pawan Yadav @ Pawan Kumar Yadav, Son of Kari Yadav,

3. Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar, Son of Satrughan Yadav, Resident of Village-Tulapatti Police Station- Pipra, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Chandra Sahani(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-07-2016 Heard leaned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Pipra P. S. Case No. 123 of 2015, disclosing offences under Sections 147, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submitted that the land dispute between the informant and the accused persons is apparent reason behind the occurrence which is alleged to have taken place. He has further submitted that with respect to same occurrence, on the basis of counter version, another First Informant Report has been instituted vide

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17986 of 2016 (4) dt.19-07-2016 2/2 Pipra P. S. Case No. 124 of 2015 in which the informant of the present case is an accused. It has also been submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Considering the above submission, this application is allowed. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Pipra P. S. Case No. 123 of 2015, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

This is subject to the condition that the petitioners shall present themselves before the police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on their part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, their bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Mishra/- U T