Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50597/2018bail granted

Zubair Khan @ Vicky v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-20Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50597 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-267 Year-2017 Thana- MUFFASIL District- West Champaran ====================================================== Zubair Khan @ Vicky, Son of Zeyaur Rehman Khan, resident of VillageSansaraiya, P.S. Bettiah Mufassil, within the district of West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amarendra Nath Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 20-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Bettiah Muffasil P.S. Case No. 267 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 279, 341, 323, 307, 326, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he tied towel around neck of informant and dragged him, causing injury to him. Injuries are simple in nature. He has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 27.05.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50597 of 2018(3) dt.20-09-2018 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Bettiah Muffasil P.S. Case No. 267 of 2017 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T