Most. Sabita Devi, v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17085 of 2019 ====================================================== Most. Sabita Devi, Wife of Late Prabhu Yadav, Resident of VillageDhakdhaiya Tola, Khurakhurawa, Ward No. 7, P.S. Semara, District- West Champaran, Bettiah.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Integrated Child Development Scheme, Social Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate, West Champaran, Bettiah. 5.

The District Programme Officer, I.C.D.S. West Champaran, Bettiah. 6.

The Child Development Programme Officer, Bagha-2, District- West Champaran, Bettiah.

7.

Shabhina Khatoon, Wife of Mohammad Azam, Resident of Village- Semra Medroll, P.S.- Semra, District- West Champaran, Bettiah. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. S.K.Ranjan, Advocate Mr. Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, G.A.-7 Mr. Uday Shankar Pandey, A.C. to G.A.7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 17-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has put to challenge an order dated 8.5.2019 passed by the District Programme Officer, West Champaran, Bettiah, whereby he has shifted respondent No. 7 in her place allegedly in violation of the guidelines issued by the Directorate, Social Welfare Department, vide Memo No. 2005 dated 27.04.2013.

Patna High Court CWJC No.17085 of 2019 dt.17-10-2019 2/2

3. In my view, the petitioner has remedy of appeal before the Divisional Commissioner under Clause-12 of the guidelines issued in relation to Angan Bari Sevika/Sahaika under Integrated Child Development Services. The said guidelines have been issued on 27.05.2019.

4. Considering the facts, this application is disposed of with a direction that if any appeal is preferred by the petitioner under Clause-12 of the guidelines within one month from today, the same shall be considered and disposed of without taking any objection to delay in making appeal. The appeal should be disposed of expeditiously, preferably within one month from the date of filing appeal.

5. The petitioner shall be at liberty to seek any interim relief in the said appeal, if the appeal before the Divisional Commissioner.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) S.Ali/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 19/10/2019 Transmission Date N.A.