Munsi Tuddu @ Munsi Tiddu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.44823 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -115 Year- 2012 Thana -BAUNSI District- ARRARIA ======================================================
1. Munsi Tuddu @ Munsi Tiddu S/o Late Barka Tuddu, R/o Vill.- Karela Kamat, P.S.- Bounsi, District- Araria.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ashok Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-09-2018 The petitioner is in custody since 14.06.2017 in connection with Sessions Trial No. 246 of 2016 arising out of Bounsi P.S. Case No. 115 of 2012, registered for offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has earlier granted privilege of anticipatory bail and he faced the trial, which resulted into his conviction and against the order of conviction, the petitioner has preferred an appeal before this Court and the appeal is remanded back to the concerned court for consideration afresh and petitioner has been in custody since 14.06.2017 and there is no likelihood of conclusion of the trial in near future.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and considering the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44823 of 2018 (3) dt.06-09-2018 2/2 aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000, (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Araria, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 246 of 2016 arising out of Bounsi P.S. Case No. 115 of 2012, with following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) (ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) (iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T