Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61397/2024allowed

Praduman Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-16Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61397 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-223 Year-2024 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== Praduman Singh, Son of Nawal Kishore Singh, Resident of Village- Umdha, PS -Chhapra Muffasil, District -Saran at Chapra (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Suman Kumari Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 16-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No.223 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a/26 of the of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that while the police force was in patrolling duty, they found that one person started fleeing seeing the police but was being apprehended. He was identified as Praduman Singh and from his possession, one country made loaded pistol was recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61397 of 2024(4) dt.16-01-2025 2/2 case due to his previous criminal antecedent. He is languishing in judicial custody since 25.04.2024. There is no independent witness of the seizure list. Though, the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of eight cases only three are of similar nature.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No. 223 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T