← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./11712/2015bail granted

Bibi Rani Khatoon And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2015-07-02Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11712 of 2015 (3) dt.02-07-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.11712 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -151 Year- 2014 Thana -SINGHESHWARASHTHAN DistrictMADHEPURA ======================================================

1. Bibi Rani Khatoon W/o Md. Pintu Resident of Village Satokhar, Police Station Singheshwar, District Madhepura.

2. Md. Pintu S/o Late Nasiruddin Resident of Village Satokhar, Police Station Singheshwar, District Madhepura.

3. Md. Firoj Alam @ Paltu S/o Late Md. Muslim Resident of Village Sukhasan, Police Station Singheshwar, District Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad For the Opposite Party/s Mr. Sakir Ahmad (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 03/ 02.07.2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State and also heard learned counsel for the informant.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Singheshwar P. S. case no. 151/2014 registered under sections 304B, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner no.1 is Gutani whereas petitioner nos. 2 and 3 are brothers-in-law of the deceased.

Although petitioners are named in the first information report but it appears from perusal of the case diary that deceased suspected about illicit relation of her husband with petitioner no.1 and furthermore, post mortem report of the deceased reveals that one ligature mark was found on the neck

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.11712 of 2015 (3) dt.02-07-2015 of the deceased. Informant has admitted in his statement that he pursued his son-in-law not to make demand of motorcycle. No specific overt-act has been attributed against these petitioners. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, this anticipatory bail petition is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest/ surrender within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order to the concerned court, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhepura in Singheshwar P. S. case no. 151/2014 subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

shahid (Hemant Kumar Srivastava,J) U T