Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50745/2018bail granted

Rajesh Kumar Sah @ Rajesh Sah v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-28Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50745 of 2018 (3) dt.28-09-2018

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50745 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -312 Year- 2017 Thana -BISFI District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== Rajesh Kumar Sah @ Rajesh Sah S/o Late Saryug Sah, R/o Vill.- Ghat Bhatra Ward No. 13, P.S.- Bisfi, District- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mrityunjay Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Bachan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 28-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Bisfi P.S. Case No. 312/2017 corresponding to G.R. No. 1085/2017, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 401, 411, 413, 414, 467, 468 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation is recovery of one stolen motorcycle from the cattle shed of the petitioner.

Petitioner is in custody since 24.12.2017.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50745 of 2018 (3) dt.28-09-2018 of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Benipatti, Madhubani in connection with Bisfi P.S. Case No. 312/2017 corresponding to G.R. No. 1085/2017, subject to the conditions:

(1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bonds.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T