Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Chaurasia And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.2884 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -58 Year- 2018 Thana -MAHESHKHUNT District- KHAGARIA ===========================================================

1. Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjeet Chaurasia Son of Sattan Chaurasia.

2. Rakesh Chaurasia Son of Late Madhurai Chaurasia. Both Resident of Village-Kajichak, P.S.- Maheshkhunt, District-Khagaria. .... .... Appellant/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, SPP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 13-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail by order dated 29.06.2018 in Maheshkhunt P.S.Case No.58 of 2018, G.R.No.1186 of 2018 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge SC/ST, Khagaria, registered under Sections 147,148,149,323,325,427,448,307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3(1)(r)(s) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. Allegation is against 14 persons to have committed assault against the informant, whereas the Doctor has found single injury at the right side of scalp of the informant.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2884 of 2018 dt.13-09-2018 2/2 Appellants have got no criminal antecedent.

Considering the fact that there is no specific allegation as to who had caused the single injury to the informant, let the appellants, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with condition that both bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and further the appellants shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellants. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal stands allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date14.09.2018 Transmission Date 14.09.2018