Krishan Kumar Sharma And ORS. v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.51563 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -90 Year- 2010 Thana -DAUDNAGAR District- AURANGABAD ===========================================================
1. Krishan Kumar Sharma son of Sukhdeo Sharma
2. Sukhdeo Sharma son of Lae Mitto Sharma
3. Shyam Sundari Devi wife of Sukhdeo Sharma
4. Kamlesh Sharma son of Sukhdeo Sharma
5. Binay Sharma son of Sukhdeo Sharma
6. Anita Sharma @ Ruby Sharma daughter of Sukhdeo Sharma All are residents of village Sector No. 02, Quarter No. B/1619/11, Jagarnathpuri Site - 4 ( Ranchi ) Jharkhand ) .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Hari Das Sharma son of Late Mahesh Sharma
3. Sachchi Sharma daughter of Hari Das Sharma Both resident of Mohalla Mallah Toli, Ward No. 21, P.S. Daud Nagar, District - Aurangabad .... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shankar Kumar, Adv. Mr. Dhanjay Kumar, Adv.
For the State : Mr. Manoj Kumar, A.P.P. For the Opposite Parties No. 2 and 3 : Mr. Bachchajee Ojha, Adv. Mr. B.K. Pandey, Adv.
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 03-09-2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State. The Petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 22.11.2014 passed by the Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Criminal Revision No. 74 of 2014 by which he has affirmed the order dated 15.5.2014 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Daudnagar, Aurangabad, permitting further examination of the Opposite Party No. 3 under the Provisions of Section 311 Cr. P.C. in connection with
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51563 of 2014 dt.03-09-2015 2/2 Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 90 of 2010, G.R. No. 486 of 2010, Tr. No. 1017 of 2014.
Since this is a second Revision in the garb of an application under Section 482 Cr. P.C and no patent illegality could be pointed out, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The application stands dismissed.
The Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial positively within a period of four months from the date of receipt of this order without granting unnecessary adjournment to any Party. (Anjana Prakash, J) S.Ali/- U T