Ravi Ranjan Kumar Pandey @ Rajiv Ranjan Kumar Pandey v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19154 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -360 Year- 2015 Thana -BUXAR District- BUXAR ====================================================== Ravi Ranjan Kumar Pandey @ Rajiv Ranjan Kumar Pandey son of Kamla Pandey, R/v Buahan Purwa, Ward No. 16, P.S. Buxar (T), Distt. Buxar .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

State of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Amrendra Kumar, Adv. Mr. Manish Rai Sharma, Advocate For Bank of Baroda Mr. Vivek Prasad, Advocate Ms. Reema, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri S.M. Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 10-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer of bail which was earlier twice rejected vide Criminal Misc. Nos. 4085/16 and 40949/16 by orders dated 18.03.2016 and 21.09.2016 respectively by this Court on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 18.12.2015. No loss was caused to anyone. It was an attempt to commit fraud and, as such, now the petitioner deserves sympathetic consideration as the trial has not been concluded within six months as per order of this Court and the petitioner was given liberty to renew his prayer of bail. It is stated that only three prosecution witnesses have been examined and in near future the trial is not likely to be concluded.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19154 of 2017 (2) dt.10-05-2017 2/2 The learned A.P.P. and learned counsel for Bank opposes the prayer of bail.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, now the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Buxar in connection with Buxar (T) P.S. Case No. 360 of 2015 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T