Gaurav Kumar @ Ghuntun v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58213 of 2022 In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.33886 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-70 Year-2022 Thana- SAKRA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== GAURAV KUMAR @ GHUNTUN Son of Late Meghu Chaudhary Resident of Village- Sambhunathpur Dholi, P.S.- Sakra, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amit Kumar Rakesh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 02-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

In this case vide order dated 09.09.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 33886 of 2022, the bail application of the petitioner was allowed.

The Modification Petition vide Cr. Misc. No. 58213 of 2022 has now been preferred stating therein that by mistake/typographical error, the first para and prayer portion of the petition instead of "NDPS Case No. 52 of 2022" it was stated as "NDPS Case 52 of 2021".

As such, the "NDPS Case 52 of 2021" be read as "NDPS Case No. 52 of 2022".

The order dated 09.09.2022 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 33886 of 2022 is modified to the following extent. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58213 of 2022(2) dt.02-11-2022 2/2 bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in connection with NDPS Case No. 52 of 2022 arising out of Sakra P.S. Case NO. 70 of 2022 subject to the following conditions :- (i) one of the bailor should be the family member of the petitioner who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide;

(ii) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bond by the Trial court itself;

(iii) he shall appear before the concerned police station every fortnight for next six months to mark his attendance;

(iv) the petitioner shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds. The Modification petition stands disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Jagdish/NehaU T