Md. Idris And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16215 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -151 Year- 2014 Thana -PURNEA SADAR District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Md. Idris Son of Nafar Ali,

2. Afroza Khatoon @ Afroza, Wife of Md. Idris

3. Quaisar Alam @ Md. Quaisar Alam Son of Md. Idris

4. Rehan Alam @ Md. Rehan Alam, Son of Md. Idris, All R/O villageDoomra, Barhampura (Purab Tola), P.S. Dagrua, District- Purnea

5. Sanjar Alam @ Md. Sanjar, Son of Abdur Rahim

6. Rozi Khatoon @ Rozi, Wife of Sanjar Alam, Both resident of village Barsauni, P.S. Sadar, District- Purnea .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Md. Helal Ahmad, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary-I(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 30-04-2015 Heard both sides.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Sadar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 151 of 2014, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 307 and other Sections of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The petitioners are in-laws of the informant. The informant made allegation against Md. Azam Raza that he happens to be maternal brother of his second wife. Md. Azam Raza use to come to his house established physical relations with his daughter Atiya Parveen, later on marriage was solemnized.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16215 of 2015 (2) dt.30-04-2015 2/2 The informant further alleged that the accused persons assaulted Atiya Parveen.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that no specific allegation of assault or demand of dowry is made against the petitioners.

Considering the facts aforesaid and the fact that Md. Azam Raza and Atiya Parveen loved each other, thereafter, marriage was solemnized, the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, are directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purnea in connection with Sadar (Muffasil) P.S. Case No. 151 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Prabhat Kumar Jha, J.) KKSINHA/- U T