Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61221/2024dismissed

Md. Wahid Alam v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-04Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61221 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2023 Thana- SANHAULA District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Md. Wahid Alam Son of Rakib Sah Resident of Village- Bhagmohabbat, P.S.- Araria, District- Araria.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar 2.

Renu Devi Wife of Madan Pandit R/O Vill.- Mahadevpur, P.S.- Sanhaula, Dist.- Bhagalpur.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ahmad Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 04-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner is languishing in custody in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366(a) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 8 of the POCSO Act.

3. As per allegation, the petitioner enticed away the minor daughter of the informant, with an intention to marry her.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner and the victim were in love with each other and the victim went along with the petitioner with her own sweet will. The petitioner is languishing in custody since

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61221 of 2024(2) dt.04-09-2024 2/2 02.07.2023. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

5. Earlier, the regular bail petition of the petitioner was rejected by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 65504 of 2023 vide order dated 22.01.2024.

6. Presently, I see no fresh ground for reconsideration of the earlier order dated 22.01.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. 65504 of 2023. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

7. If there is no progress in the trial, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after six months from today before the court below itself. The learned court below shall allow the bail application, if there is no any subsequent ground for making the petitioner disentitled from deserving the privileges of bail.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) kundan/- U T