Indal Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30398 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -230 Year- 2017 Thana -RAJIVNAGAR District- PATNA ====================================================== Indal Rai son of Pawan Kumary Ray @ Pawan Rai @ Chela Rai resident of Chhihattar Chak, Police Station - Pahleja, District - Saran, at present Panchvati Colony, Digha Amrudi Bagicha, Police Station - Digha, District - Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar Singh -5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 16-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 18.10.2017 in connection with Rajiv Nagar P.S. Case No. 230 of 2017 for the offence registered under Sections 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner was not named in the first information report, but he was subsequently, arrested in connection with the alleged bank dacoity and on the basis of his self confession, he has been remanded in connection with the present case. It is further submitted that the petitioner was placed on T.I. Parade but in the

same he has not been identified. It is further submitted that there was no recovery from the possession of the petitioner and he is languishing in jail for no fault of his own.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Judge - III, Patna in connection with Rajiv Nagar P.S. Case No. 230 of 2017, subject to the following conditions :-

(1) one of the bailors will be his father.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and

in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U T