Lal Mohan Yadav @ Lalla v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.43065 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2018 Thana- MOUZAHIDPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Lal Mohan Yadav @ Lalla S/o Gurudev Yadav @ Gurudev Parsad Yadav, R/o Mohalla- Gangati, P.S.- Babarganj, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dr. Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Sri Abhay Kumar Roy ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner seeks bail in Mojahidpur (Babarganj) P.S. Case No. 20 of 2018 in S.T. No. 336 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 4/5 of Explosive Substances Act, 2000.
Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of one country made bomb from his bag on secret information received by the Informant, who is Sub Inspector of Police. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has been implicated in this case on suspicion. Petitioner in custody since 28.01.2018.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43065 of 2018(6) dt.24-09-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-V, Bhagalpur, in connection with Mojahidpur (Babarganj) P.S. Case No. 20 of 2018 in S.T. No. 336 of 2018, with following conditions:-
(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U