Patna High CourtCR. MISC./43779/2018bail granted

Mangal Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2018-09-25Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43779 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-358 Year-2016 Thana- BUDDHACOLONY District- Patna ====================================================== Mangal Kumar son of Rajdeo Mahto, resident of Village- Rajapur, Police Station- Sri Krishnapuri, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Anuj Kumar Srivastava ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Buddha Colony P.S. Case No. 358 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of committing theft of six mobile phones, laptop and Rs. 1500/- cash from the house of the Informant. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case on suspicion. Petitioner is in custody since 15.12.2017. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43779 of 2018(4) dt.25-09-2018 2/2 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate- 1st Class, Patna, in connection with Buddha Colony P.S. Case No. 358 of 2016, with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U