Ajit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60572 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-202 Year-2022 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== Ajit Kumar Son of Nawal Rai Resident of village- Kauriya, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Abhishek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Nagendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 342, 324, 307, 302, 337, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Petitioner along with other accused persons are said to have assaulted the informant's side by means of weapons due to which persons of the informant's side sustained injury. The husband of the informant was taken to hospital where he was declared dead.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that there is specific allegation of assault to informant's husband (deceased) is levelled against co-accused Brajnod Yadav and Jaybodh Yadav. There is allegation against
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60572 of 2024(2) dt.21-08-2024 2/2 the petitioner to assault one Mausam Kumar by means of iron rod causing head injury. He submits that similarly situated coaccused has already been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 06.02.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 61555 of 2022. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail application and he is languishing in judicial custody since 12.06.2024.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 202 of 2022.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T