Manjesh Kumar Yadav @ Manjesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.20361 of 2016 Arising out of PS.Case No. -82 Year- 2015 Thana -NIMACHANDPUR District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Manjesh Kumar Yadav @ Manjesh Yadav, S/o Shivnandan Yadav, resident of village - Rajopur, P.S. Dandari, District - Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sada Nand Roy, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. H.A.Khan(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-07-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner is languishing in custody since 01.02.2016 in connection with Neema Chandpura P.S. Case No. 82/2015 for the offences instituted under Section 386 of the IPC. The prosecution story, in brief, is that the informant received mobile calls on his mobile and the caller demanded Rs. 15,00,000/- otherwise both the brothers would be killed. Later on, demand was reduced to Rs. 5,00,000/- which was not given then it was increased to Rs. 10,00,000/-.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 01.02.2016 and the charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. The petitioner is not named in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20361 of 2016 (3) dt.19-07-2016 2/2 the F.I.R. In course of investigation, it has come that ransom was demanded from the mobile of the petitioner. The said evidence has come in paragraph no. 39 of the case diary. Except for this there is no evidence to implicate the petitioner in the present case. On behalf of the State it has been submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. but he has as many as five cases pending against him.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. The same is rejected in Neema Chandpura P.S. Case No. 82/2015, pending in the court of the learned J.M. Ist Class, Begusarai. U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T