← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./56108/2022allowed

Vineet Singh @ Vineet Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2022-11-04Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56108 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-72 Year-2022 Thana- JAGDISHPUR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== 1.

VINEET SINGH @ VINEET KUMAR SINGH Son of Ramadhar Singh Resident of Village- Narayanpur, Police Station- Jagdishpur, DistrictBhojpur 2.

DABLU SINGH @ SUJIT KUMAR SINGH Son of Vijay Singh @ Vijay Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Narayanpur, Police Station- Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur 3.

SANOJ SINGH Son of Gharbharan Singh Resident of Village- Narayanpur, Police Station- Jagdishpur, District- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rama Kant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shantanu Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 04-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State through virtual Court proceedings. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 30(d) of the Bihar Excise Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and allegation is of recovery of 50 litres liquor from a place near bank of a river in village Harbansh K Tola and 700 liters of mahua which was destroyed at the spot.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56108 of 2022(2) dt.04-11-2022 2/2 petitioners were not apprehended from the spot as such nothing was recovered from their conscious possession and they came to be implicated at the instance of S.H.O. Jagdishpur, it is also submitted that the place from where the alleged recovery was made is accessible to public at large.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 1,000/- (Rupees One Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Jagdishpur P.S. Case No. 72 of 2022 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T