Ajeet Kumar Manjhi @ Ajit Kumar Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57625 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-142 Year-2025 Thana- CHAKAND District- Gaya ====================================================== Ajeet Kumar Manjhi @ Ajit Kumar Manjhi, S/O Late Mundrika Manjhi @ Munik Manjhi, Resident of Mohalla- Vinoba Nagar, P.S.- Magadh Medical, Dist.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajit Ranjan Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Chakand P.S. Case No. 142 of 2025 for the offence registered under Section 309 (4) of the BNS.
3. As per the prosecution case, four persons looted Rs.1,50,000/- along with the scooty and mobile from the informant near Bara Pul when he was coming to his house at Panjabi Colony.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion. Further submission is that petitioner is not named in the FIR. So far as the mobile phone
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57625 of 2025(4) dt.15-11-2025 2/3 recovered from possession of the petitioner, is purchased by the petitioner. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He has never put on Test Identification Parade. Charge-sheet has already been submitted after completion of investigation and there is no chance of his absconding or tampering with the evidence. Petitioner has clean antecedent. Petitioner is in custody since 23.05.2025 and he undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions of learned counsel for the parties and period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-V, Gaya, in connection with Chakand P.S. Case No. 142 of 2025 with further conditions:- (i) the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his bail bonds by the Trial Court itself;
(ii) the petitioner shall in no way try to induce or
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57625 of 2025(4) dt.15-11-2025 3/3 promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidence, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds.
(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) khushbu/- U T