Jay Shankar Thakur @ Thakur Jay Shankar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.16389 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -342 Year- 2016 Thana -SAMASTIPUR District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================
1. Jay Shankar Thakur @ Thakur Jay Shankar, s/o Dr. Girish Kr. Thakur @ Girish Thakur, resident of Kashipur, ward no. 12, PS- Town, DistSamastipur
2. Mritunjay Jha, s/o Rambali Jha, r/o vill-Khatuaha, PO+PS- Khanpur, Dist- Samastipur .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-04-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Addl. Public Prosecutor.
The petitioners pray for anticipatory bail in connection with Samastipur Town P.S. case no. 342 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 307, 504 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code and Sec. 27 of Arms Act. It is submitted on behalf of petitioners that specific allegation is against one Uday Thakur and not against these petitioners and the dispute is relating to coaching institutes; one run by informant of this case and other run by Uday Thakur. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides. Considering aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the anticipatory bail
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.16389 of 2017 (2) dt.08-04-2017 2/2 application of petitioners is allowed and they, in the event of arrest/ surrender before the court below within four weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur in connection with Samastipur Town P.S. case no. 342 of 2016 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a condition that bailors should be the local one having sufficient property within the jurisdiction of learned court below and with further condition that petitioners will cooperate and assist in the investigation of the case and if they fails to assist the investigating officer, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of their bail bonds. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) rinkee/- U T