Nandan Singh @ Nandan Kumar @ Chandan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57882 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2019 Thana- NAUBATPUR District- Patna ====================================================== NANDAN SINGH @ NANDAN KUMAR @ CHANDAN SINGH Son of Krishna Mohan Singh @ Tali Singh @ Talli Resident of Village - Parsa, P.S.- Naubatpur, Distt - Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shiw Kumar Prabhakar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Chandra Sen Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-02-2020 Heard the parties.
This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Naubatpur P.S.Case no.206 of 2019 dated 28.3.2019 for the offences under Sections 320, 120(b) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as Section 27 of the Arms Act. As per the FIR, co-accused Pappu Singh came inside his house and shot dead his wife dead. It is also alleged that his wife has no brother and there was property dispute between his wife and the petitioner, who is her cousin brother and he in conspiracy with the co-accused Pappu Singh got his wife killed.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner was in custody at that time and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57882 of 2019(4) dt.06-02-2020 2/2 except the allegation of the conspiracy there was nothing against him and he is in custody since 24.4.2019.
Heard learned A.P.P. , who has opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that the materials collected during the course of investigation clearly discloses that he in conspiracy with the co-accused has got wife of the informant killed. Having heard both sides and considering the submission as made above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage. Accordingly, this application is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to move after framing of the charge.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T