Karuna Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7360 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -144 Year- 2016 Thana -KARPI District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== Karuna Kumari, wife of Sri Dev Bansh, Resident of Village- Shankarpur, P.S.- Kinjer, District- Arwal.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Mukeshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 22-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner apprehends her arrest in Karpi P.S. Case No. 144 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Section (s) 420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. There is allegation against this petitioner that the name of the father of this petitioner has been mentioned in matriculation certificate and intermediate certificate as Yogi Singh, whereas in the application form and in the result of BETET, the name of the father of the petitioner has been mentioned as Bishundeo Mehta. It has been alleged that panchayat Secretary Ayub Ansari and others have appointed the petitioner fraudulently on the basis of forged and fabricated certificates.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7360 of 2017 (2) dt.22-02-2017 2/2 It has been mentioned in para 9 of the petition that father of the petitioner is also known by the name of Bishundeo Mehta which is the alias name and the same has been mentioned in the application form of BETET and accordingly in the result, the father's name of the petitioner was mentioned as Bishundeo Mehta. Moreover, from the written report itself, it appears that all the certificates were checked and verified before appointment by the appropriate authorities.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, above named, within six weeks from today in connection with Karpi P.S. Case No. 144 of 2016, she shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arwal, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of Cr.P.C.

(Sanjay Priya, J) Shageer/- U T