Sajeed @ Guddu Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22306 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -239 Year- 2013 Thana -BETTIAH TOWN DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Sajeed @ Guddu Ansari S/o Shubhan Mian R/o Purainia, P.S. Chanpatiya, District - West Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Akbar Ali, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 05-07-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bettiah (town) P.S. Case No. 239 of 2013 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner is not named in the first information report. It is submitted that his name transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused Santu Mian and Sadam Mian, nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Santu Mian, Sahzad Alam, Bajul Mian and Kapildeo Patel have already been allowed bail by different benches of this Court and the petitioner without any fault is suffering in custody since 22.01.2016.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22306 of 2016 (3) dt.05-07-2016 2/2 The learned A.P.P submits that the petitioner has got criminal antecedent.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, considering that from perusal of the impugned order, it reveals that besides confessional statement of co-accused who have already been allowed bail, there is no other material against the petitioner, as such, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Bettiah (town) P.S. Case No. 239 of 2013, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Mishra/- U T