Arun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61981 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-690 Year-2022 Thana- GHORASAHAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

Arun Kumar Son Of Jagat Narayan Prasad Resident Of Village- Pipara, PsDarpa, Distt- East Champaran , Motihari 2.

Kalawati Devi Wife Of Arun Kumar Resident Of Village- Pipara, Ps- Darpa, Distt- East Champaran , Motihari ... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nirmal Kumar Sinha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 17-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable u/s 304(B), 201, 120/34 of the IPC.

3. As per the prosecution case, daughter of the informant has been killed by the F.I.R. named accused persons including the petitioners (in-laws of the deceased) due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case due to grudge. Petitioners have no concern with the alleged occurrence.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61981 of 2023(2) dt.17-10-2023 2/2 The allegation leveled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. They have never made any dowry demand and they were living separately from the deceased. It is further submitted that petitioner no. 1 is the brother-in-law (Nandoshi) and petitioner no. 2 is the sister-inlaw of the deceased and husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody, which is mentioned in paragraph 12 of the petition. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since husband of the deceased is already in custody, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/Successor Court in connection with Ghorasahan (Jitna) P.S. Case No. 690 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) annpurna/- U T