Ravi Yadav @ Ravi Bhushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
This judgment came from a scanned document and its text layer is unreliable — words may be garbled. Check the original PDF before relying on any passage.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.3189 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2025 Thana- SC/ST District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
Ravi Yadav @ Ravi Bhushan Kumar S/o Late Ramlakhan Yadav Resident of village- Chowar, P.S.- Tankuppa, District- Gaya, 2.
Janardhan Yadav @ Janardhan Prasad S/o Late Janaki Yadav R/o vill - Basadhi, P.S.- Bodhgaya, Distt.- Gaya 3.
Lalan Yadav @ Lalan Kumar Yadav S/o Ram Shiwalak Yadav @ Shiv Balak Yadav R/o vill - Silounja, P.S.- Bodhgaya, Distt.- Gaya 4.
Mahendra Yadav @ Mahendra Prasad S/o Basudev Yadav R/o vill - Basadhi, P.S.- Bodhgaya, Distt.- Gaya 5.
Mantu Yadav @ Manu Yadav @ Mantu Kumar S/o Basudev Yadav R/o vill - Basadhi, P.S.- Bodhgaya, Distt.- Gaya 6.
Gaya Yadav @ Gayanand Kumar S/o Rameshwar Yadav R/o vill - Darjiyachak, P.S.- Tankuppa, Distt.- Gaya ... ... Appellant/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Vinod Ravidas S/o Late Munshi Ravidas R/o vill - Basadhi, P.S.- Bodhgaya, Distt.- Gaya ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Appellant/s :
Mr. Gajendra Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :
Mrs. Usha Kumari 1 For the Res. No. 2 :
Mr. Devashish Giri, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 23-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the appellants, the learned Spl. P.P. for the State and the learned counsel for the informant.
2. This appeal is preferred against the order dated
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3189 of 2025(4) dt.23-12-2025 2/3 28.06.2025 passed by the learned Exclusive Special Judge, SC/ST (POA)Act, Gaya passed in ABP No. 170 of 2025 arising out of SC/ST P.S. Case No. 28 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and under Sections 3(i)(r)(s)(f), 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act, by which the prayer of the appellants for anticipatory bail was rejected.
3. As per the prosecution case, the appellants are said to have acquired the land of the informant and they set up a brick kiln on the said land and by making roads on that land, sand-laden trucks and heavy vehicles were being used. When the informant objected the same, accused Munshi along with his associates started abusing the informant by taking caste name and threatened for dire consequences.
4. Considering the allegations levelled against the appellants in the FIR, in the opinion of this Court, no case for anticipatory bail is made out and therefore, the appeal for anticipatory stands rejected.
5. The appellants are directed to surrender in the court below within a period of four weeks from today and seek regular bail failing which the Senior Superintendent of Police, Gaya will all take steps for the arrest of the appellants.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.3189 of 2025(4) dt.23-12-2025 3/3
6. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Gaya through FAX for its compliance forthwith.
(Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U