Anil Mandal @ Anil Kumar Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56507 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1214 Year-2022 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== Anil Mandal @ Anil Kumar Mandal S/O Swruplal Mandal R/O Vill.- Dhapariya, P.S.- Supaul, (Laukha O.P.), Dist.- Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Naresh Kumar Mehta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 22-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Supaul (Laukha O.P.) P.S. Case No. 1214 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, petitioner and others are said to have committed the murder of informant's daughter.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer for bail of the present petitioner has already been rejected on merit by this Court on 13.09.2024. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR and he has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner bears no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56507 of 2025(2) dt.22-08-2025 2/2 Petitioner is in custody since 11.01.2023.

5. The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner submitting that in para-11 and 12 of the case diary witnesses have supported the case of the prosecution. He further submits that reason behind the occurrence is that petitioner being husband is said to have illicit relation with his Bhabhi and on account of said relation, victim/wife was assaulted, who succumbed to the injury and postmortem report is quite explicit with regard to number of injury and nature of injury sustained by the deceased. He further submits that the bail prayer of the petitioner was rejected on merit vide order dated 13.09.2024 and there is no fresh ground for considering the bail prayer of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of bail of the petitioner has already been rejected on merit, nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner coupled with postmortem report as well as material available on record, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) alok/- U T