Wakil Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6218 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -65 Year- 2014 Thana -PAHARPUR DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Wakil Mahto son of Radha Mohan Mahto Resident of Village - Naya Gown Padriya, Police Station - Paharpur, District - East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar No.-7 For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Indiwar Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 16-02-2017 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 65 of 2014, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 324, 326, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is land dispute between the parties for which only general and omnibus allegation has been levelled against this petitioner and the allegation of assault is against the co-accused person of this case. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that only general and omnibus allegation has been levelled against this petitioner and the allegation of assault is against other co-accuse of this case and also the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6218 of 2017 (2) dt.16-02-2017 2/2 of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, East Champaran at Motihari in connection with Paharpur P.S. Case No. 65 of 2014, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. This is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part two appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U