← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/12212/2023disposed

Ajit Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-12-04Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12212 of 2023 ====================================================== Ajit Kumar Singh son of Late Suresh Singh, Resident of Village and P.O. and P.s. Darauli, District Siwan, Bihar.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Siwan.

4.

The District Education Officer, Siwan.

5.

The Principal Gopaljee Prasad Higher Secondary School, Sani Basantpur, Goreyakothi, District-Siwan.

6.

Manager Chauhan, Librarian, son of Basisth Chauhan, Resident of Village and P.O. and P.S. Darauli, District-Siwan, presently working at Gopalji Prasad Higher Secondary School, Sani Basantpur, Goreyakothi, District Siwan.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Madhaw Prasad Yadaw, GP-23 Ms. Meera Singh, AC to GP-23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 04-12-2023 Heard the parties.

2. The petitioner has prayed for the following relief: " A direction may be given to the respondent no. 3 to 5 for examination /verification of the Education Certificates of the respondent no. 6 is found fake, the selection of the respondent no. 6 may be cancelled with immediate effect."

3. The District Magistrate, Siwan is directed to dispose of the representation dated 25.02.2023 in accordance with law within three months of the communication of this

Patna High Court CWJC No.12212 of 2023(2) dt.04-12-2023 2/2 order.

4. If required, the District Magistrate may conduct an enquiry on the allegations levelled by the petitioner against respondent no. 6. In such an enquiry, the respondent no. 6 also must be heard before any adverse order is passed by the District Magistrate against the respondent no. 6.

5. The application stands disposed of.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U