Sangeeta Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58881 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-648 Year-2024 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN DistrictGopalganj ====================================================== 1.

Sangeeta Devi W/o Chhotelal Ram R/o Village- Basdila Khas, P.S. and District- Gopalganj 2.

Nawal Kishore @ Nawal Kishore Ram S/o Badelal Ram R/o VillageBasdila Khas, P.S. and District- Gopalganj 3.

Munna Kumar S/o Chhotelal Ram R/o Village- Basdila Khas, P.S. and District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Lalan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 3(5) of the B.N.S.S.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have antecedent of one case and petitioner no.1 is a woman and the informant alleges that the banana tree of the petitioners fell as such son of the informant picked the fallen tree when accused persons came and the Sangeeta Devi (petitioner) assaulted her by lathi causing injury on head,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58881 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/3 thereafter Nawal assaulted Chris by rod causing injury on head while Munna and Gayatri assaulted Munna of the side of the informant by lathi causing injury on forehead.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that the side of the informant was trying to take away the banana tree of the petitioners when an altercation took place, in which both side assaulted each other. It is also submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature as would manifest from Annexure-3 series to the anticipatory bail application and the blow is not alleged to have been repeated. It is also submitted that from side of the petitioners also one person died on account of assault, for which Gopalganj P.S. Case No.647/2024 has been instituted.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58881 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 3/3 (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Gopalganj Town P.S. Case No.648/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T