Gaaji Gaddi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63557 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-113 Year-2025 Thana- DHANAHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== 1.
Gaaji Gaddi Son of Mankeshwar Gaddi Resident of Village -Dokari PSDhanaha, Dist- West Champaran 2.
Mohammad Gaddi son of Mankeshwar Gaddi Resident of Village -Dokari PS- Dhanaha, Dist- West Champaran 3.
Sakir Gaddi @ Sakir Ali son of Gaaji Gaddi Resident of Village -Dokari PSDhanaha, Dist- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Prithvi Nath Mishra, Adv.
For the State :
Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh, APP For the Informant :
Mr.Shahbaj Alam, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109(1), 303(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S..
3. As per prosecution case, all the name accused persons including the petitioners assaulted the informant and others with katta and farsa.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63557 of 2025(3) dt.24-09-2025 2/3 behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. It is submitted that the injuries sustained by the informant and others are simple in nature. There is case and counter-case between the parties. Learned counsel further submits that both sides are agnates and there is land dispute between the parties. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus in nature. Petitioner no.3 claims clean antecedents while petitioner no.1 and 2 had one case in which they have been acquitted.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, simple injury of the injured, case and counter-case between the parties, clean antecedent of petitioners, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bagaha, West Champaran, in connection with Dhanaha
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63557 of 2025(3) dt.24-09-2025 3/3 P.S. Case No.113 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S..
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) pallavi/- U T