Ram Pravesh Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68441 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-156 Year-2021 Thana- MAHNAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

RAM PRAVESH SAHNI Son of Late Nathu Sahni Resident of village - Mohmadpur, P.S.- Mahnar, District - Vaishali at Hajipur 2.

Manti Devi Wife of Ram Pravesh Sahni Resident of village - Mohmadpur, P.S.- Mahnar, District - Vaishali at Hajipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Priyesh Kumar, Informant ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 24-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State and perused the case diary. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341, 307 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code. While the accused persons assaulted upon the informant, his father, namely, Sakaldeo Sahni came to save him and thereafter succumbed to the injuries. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is general and omnibus allegation against them and there is no specific allegation against the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.68441 of 2021(3) dt.24-08-2022 2/2 petitioners. From perusal of the Postmortem report, it appears that the cause of death is not ascertained by the doctor because the wound healed at that time. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and both parties have sustained injuries, as alleged, in separate incident. He further submits that the FIR has been lodged after ten days of the occurrence.

Learned APP appearing for the State opposed the anticipatory bail.

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Mahnar P.S. Case No. 156 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Brajesh Kumar/- U T