Fuleshwar Sardar @ Tentu Sardar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.49346 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -365 Year- 2014 Thana -FORBESGANJ District- ARRARIA ======================================================
1. Fuleshwar Sardar @ Tentu Sardar S/o Late Bahuri Sardar, resident of Village- Ghoraghat, P.S.- Forbesganj, District- Araria. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Prakash Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwary, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Forbesganj P.S.Case No. 365 of 2014, registered for offences punishable under Sections 498-A, 304 (B) and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per F.I.R. allegation against the petitioner, who happens to be father -in-law of the deceased, is of killing the deceased due to non fulfillment of demand of dowry. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated merely on the basis of suspicion and no specific allegation has been attributed against him and he is in custody since 29.05.2018 and charge sheet
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49346 of 2018 (3) dt.03-10-2018 2/2 has been submitted.
Heard learned A.P.P also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- ( Rupees Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria in connection with Forbesganj P.S.Case No. 365 of 2014, subject to the following conditions:- i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
iii) It is made clear that if petitioner found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T