Patna High CourtCR. MISC./55865/2025bail rejected

Ghanshyam Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-09Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55865 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-197 Year-2024 Thana- BHORE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Ghanshyam Yadav S/O Swaminath Yadav Resident of Village- Piprahi usarha, PS- Nagra, Distt-Balia,(U.P.) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Saurabh Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 09-09-2025 Heard Mr. Shashwat Sahil singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Fahimuddin, learned APP.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Bhore P.S. Case No. 197 of 2024 for the offence registered under sections 406, 420 of the IPC.

3. As per the prosecution story, the Branch Manager of Sinduza Micro Pvt. Ltd., Bhore Branch, Gopalganj alleged that the petitioner was serving between 18/02/2022 to 30/05/2024 at the said branch, collected Rs. 6,00,750/- which he got transferred in his personal account and later, wanted some time to return the same. As he failed to do so, the FIR.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he left the job on 30.05.2024 and the FIR was lodged on 01.08.2024 clearly showing the false implication. Further, the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55865 of 2025(2) dt.09-09-2025 2/2 document would show that same person has put in signature against all columns.

5. Learned APP submits that poor people made payment, collected by the petitioners serving in the branch, got it transferred in his own account and later, chose to leave the place/post. He as such, opposes the prayer.

6. Taking into account the submissions of the parties as also the materials on record, clearly the case lodged against the petitioner shows his intention of cheating 32 innocent poor people.

7. In that background, it would be appropriate that the petitioner seek bail. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U T