← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53377/2019bail granted

Jai Prakash Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-26Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53377 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-50 Year-2019 Thana- NATWAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Jai Prakash Singh, Son of Sigashan Singh Resident of Village- Saraon Tola, Police Station- Natwar, District- Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajani Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Shakir Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Natwar P.S. Case No.50 of 2019 for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 354(b), 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner, as mentioned in the FIR is that the informant's son as well as son of the petitioner was playing near the house of the informant and were fighting amongst themselves. When the informant objected, the son of the petitioner, the petitioner came out from his house and started abusing the informant and assaulted with Tangi on his head causing injury to the informant.

Mr. Rajnikant Singh, learned counsel appearing for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53377 of 2019(2) dt.26-08-2019 2/2 the petitioner submits that both the parties are neighbour and due to fight between two kids belonging to the petitioner as well as informant, dispute has arisen. Learned counsel further submits that injury caused to the informant is simple in nature as as evident from Annexure-2.

After having heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State and taking into consideration the fact that both the parties are neighbour and further injury caused to the informant is simple in nature, as such, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of surrender by him, he shall be released on anticipatory bail by the Court below upon furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Bikramganj, subject to the condition as mentioned under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) sanjeev/- U T