Golu Rai @ Golu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53709 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2019 Thana- PIYAR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== 1.

GOLU RAI @ GOLU KUMAR Son of Anil Ray Resident of Village - Rampur Dayal, P.S.- Pear, Distt - Muzaffarpur. 2.

Anil Ray Son of Ram Chandra Rai Resident of Village - Rampur Dayal, P.S.- Pear, Distt - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjeev Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Veena Kumari Jaiswal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in Piyar P.S. Case No. 111 of 2019, disclosing offence under Sections 272,273,414/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 38, 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. In view of the Full Bench decision rendered in the case of Ram Vinay Yadav vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2019(2) PLJR 1089, this application cannot be maintained and is accordingly dismissed.

However, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the Court below within four weeks from today and seek regular bail, if so advised. If they do so, their application for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53709 of 2019(2) dt.28-08-2019 2/2 regular bail shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by rejection of the present application for grant of anticipatory bail by this Court.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) arun/- U