Lalan Kumar Sis @ Lalan Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43795 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -299 Year- 2017 Thana -CHAPRA TOWN District- SARAN ======================================================

1. Lalan Kumar Sis @ Lalan Singh, son of late Ramadhar Singh, resident of village- Rathour Tola, Police Station- Chapra Muffasil, DistrictSaran (Chapra). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 01-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Chapra Town P.S. Case No.299 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B Indian Penal Code. Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is only alleged to be the witness on sale deed dated 19.09.2015 in which Ramjee Manjhi, Budhu Manjhi and Mosmat Anaki Kunwar were vendors while Akhilesh Manjhi and Binod Kumar were vendee. They have no objection about the aforesaid sale deed.

First Information Report has been lodged by the informant levelling allegation that his land has been sold. The petitioner is in no manner beneficiary of the aforesaid sale deed.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43795 of 2018 (3) dt.01-08-2018 2/2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioner for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioner, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No.299 of 2017, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Chapra District- Saran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C.

with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be liable to cancel his bail bond and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- Rohit Kr.

U T