Patna High CourtCR. MISC./22821/2016bail granted

Goloo Kumar @ Golu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-05-26Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22821 of 2016 (2) dt.26-05-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22821 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -525 Year- 2015 Thana -MUZAFFARPUR SADAR DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. GOLOO KUMAR @ GOLU KUMAR son of Late Kedar Nath Prasad Resident of Village- Bhagwanpur, Yadav Nagar, P.S.- Sadar, DistrictMuzaffarpur..... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kr Singh No.1 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Ansural Haque(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 26-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 525 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is not named in the first information report and from perusal of the impugned order it reveals that the name of the petitioner transpired in confessional statement of co-accused Javed @ Chauba and the petitioner is in custody since 03.02.2016 but he has not been put on test identification parade and nothing has been recovered from his possession. Co-accused Javed @ Chauba and Chandan Kumar have already been allowed bail by different Benches of this Court to which learned APP does not dispute.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22821 of 2016 (2) dt.26-05-2016 In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 525 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T