Arun Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57354 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-207 Year-2020 Thana- FATUA District- Patna ====================================================== Arun Kumar S/O Munarik Ray Village - Garhochak, PS - Nadi Distt - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Jay Ram Prasad , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State .
2. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341 , 323 , 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 25 (1-b)/a/26(1) of Arms Act .
3 . The prosecution case , in brief, is that informant namely , Raju Raj alleged that on 13.03.2020, informant went to Chowmine shop , all of a sudden this petitioner along with other co-accused persons and unknown persons came near him and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57354 of 2025(3) dt.28-11-2025 2/3 pointed katta on him, abused him and due to which a scuffle took place between them in which one country made pistol fell into drainage and thereafter on arrival of police all the accused persons fled away .
4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that from bare perusal of F.I.R., it is apparent that there is enmity going on between the parties since long and only with a view to harass the petitioner, this present false and concocted case has been lodged. All sections of IPC are bailable in nature . It is further submitted that the alleged pistol was produced by the private person which comes under the purview of section 37 (B) of Arms Act which is bailable in nature . There is no allegation of assault against this petitioner. Petitioner claims clean antecedent. Similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Hon'ble Court vide order dated 23.07.2024 in Cr. Misc. No. 43251 of 2024 .
5 . Learned counsel for the State oppose the bail petition .
6 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today, let the petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57354 of 2025(3) dt.28-11-2025 3/3 two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM - II Patna City in connection with Fatuha P.S. Case No. 207 of 2020, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure . (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T