Patna High CourtCWJC/5974/2015dismissed

Ramanuj Prasad v. The Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. And ORS

2015-07-03Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5974 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Ramanuj Prasad, aged about 55 years. Son of Mahendra Prasad, presently posted as Principal (under suspension), D.A.V. Public School, B.S.E.B. Colony, P.S.- Shastri Nagar, District and Town - Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Ltd. its Chairman cum Managing Director, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

2. The Chairman cum managing Director, the Bihar State Power ( Holding) Company Ltd., Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3. The General Manager (HR & Admin), Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Ltd. cum Chairman of the Local Managing Committee of the DAV, BSEB Colony, having office at Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

4. The DAV College Managing Committee, (DAVCMC) through its General Secretary, Chitra Gupta Road, N. Delhi - 110055.

5. The General Secretary, DAV College Managing Committee, (DAVCMC) through its General Secretary, Chitra Gupta Road, N.Delhi - 110055.

6. Indrajeet Rai, Incharge Principal cum Assistant Regional Director (Patna ZoneI), DAV Public School, BSEB Colony, having office at Vidyut Bhawan Bailey Road, Patna.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr K.N.Chaubey, Sr. Advocate Mr. Ambuj Nayan Chaubey For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr. Anand K Ojha For Respondents 4 to 6 : Mr Anil Kumar Singh =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 03-07-2015 Probably, learned senior counsel does not want to precipitate the matter in the interest of the litigant looking at the materials, which have emerged not only against the institution but also the conduct of the petitioner which led to disrepute of the institution as well as the petitioner. This led to de-recognition by the Central Board of Secondary Education which has jeopardized the future of thousands of students.

Patna High Court CWJC No.5974 of 2015 dt.03-07-2015 2/2 Be that as it may, since the counsel wants to withdraw the writ application and does not want to press the issue any further, writ is dismissed as not pressed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) sk U